Thanks to Jon Lemaitre's excellent article "A Response to PHP the wrong way", I recently discovered http://phpthewrongway.com self-exposed as the counterbalance of http://phptherightway.com. Then came the need to write an answer on the subject, my views on framework, OOP, standards and the rest but I realized I would end up with a very long article full of obvious arguments or at least statements many people already know. Boring. Seriously who wants to read another pros and cons on frameworks and OOP ? Is it really worth discussing it nowadays, knowing how many classes are offered by PHP itself and how its own syntax is object oriented ? I just think that if you don't want to write OOP code with PHP, you're free to use another language or to fork PHP 3.
The only subject I will cover in this post is the usage of design patterns. It could have been the wisest part of "PHP the wrong way" but the author failed to provide relevant arguments by focusing on a philosophical point of view. My goal here is to bring a more objective point of view with technical facts.
The wrong way: Looking for a pattern to solve a problem
True, this is a dogmatic approach we must stay away from. Patterns were designed to implement common needs like separation of responsibilities, open/close principle and to save some precious time finding design solutions. However, it has some drawbacks and the use of design patterns requires skills and common sense.